The Birth of America’s Obsession With a Perfect Cup of Coffee

Wanted: someone to set a record true on coffee’s health effects and work out a recipe for a perfect cup.

This was a National Coffee Roasters Association’s tender to Massachusetts Institute of Technology highbrow Samuel Prescott in 1920, in sell for $40,000 value of appropriation (half a million today). The open was fed adult with snake-oil-style health ads and were newly stable from fake pseudo-medical wrapping by legislation. So coffee peddlers indispensable some-more precise, systematic promotion — and zero embodied pointing like MIT.

Prescott coffee web

Professor Samuel Cate Prescott in his new laboratory clinging to perfecting coffee in 1920.

Source MIT Museum

Prescott supposed a gig and was shortly monitoring coffee’s effects on rabbits. He distant decades of misrepresentation from legitimate literature, sipping pornographic quantities of brownish-red bullion for 3 years before delivering a ideal cuppa: “One tablespoon of coffee per 8 ounces of water, only brief of boiling, in potion or ceramic containers, never boiled, reheated or reused.” Prescott didn’t wish his sincerely simple investigate bandied about, though that didn’t stop a coffee roasters from plastering his quotes for 36 million journal readers to see. Just 20 years earlier, coffee was famous for being cut with sawdust, though brewing had now turn an practice in perfection.

To entirely know coffee brewing’s experimental affair, we need to rewind to a magnates, Mad group and bad scholarship involved. Rising direct via a 19th century gathering large enlargement of Brazilian plantations. Coffee group gamble and bought like stockbrokers, on wisps of rumors of boom or bust in Brazil, until, by a 1890s, healthy preference had honed an oligopoly of coffee-industry early birds like Folgers, Chase and Sanborn.

The late 19th century was a bang time for claims from obvious medicines and psychological misinformation.

Mark Pendergrast, coffee historian

Of a magnates, John Arbuckle wrote a book on coffee salesmanship. His decoction was conveniently prepacked with prize-redeemable coupons in any bag, finished in beautifully crafted collectible crates. When Hermann Sielcken, Arbuckle’s biggest competitor, targeted Native American buyers by observant his coffee done group as clever as a lion on a wrapper, Arbuckle retorted that his insignia’s angel was stronger than 10,000 lions. If “Lion wants to kick my angel, they’ll have to put on their tag a design of God himself,” he mused.

Arbuckle modernized coffee promotion with dual Don Draper-ish tricks: undermining self-worth and earnest health. People had argued about coffee’s healthiness for hundreds of years, though it was Arbuckle’s ads that alike learned coffee brewing with wifeliness, exploiting housewives’ insecurities, and healthy living.

The attention shortly adopted his suggestive, insecurity-targeting promotion style, though they weren’t alone. A peep inundate of snake-oil-like entrepreneurs had also noticed, and as coffee historian Mark Pendergrast tells OZY, “the late 19th century was a bang time for claims from obvious medicines and psychological misinformation.”

Arbuckle's Coffee

Among them was roving salesman C.W. Post, whose judgment of a “coffee substitute” of burned-and-ground cereal called Postum seemed cursed to destroy in 1895. But he pushed it with a extreme campaign, with headlines like “Lost Eyesight Through Coffee Drinking,” citing impostor physicians and equating caffeine to “cocaine, morphine, nicotine and strychnine.” Post claimed that business could “recover from any typical illness by discontinuing coffee … and regulating Postum.” Within a decade he was a millionaire, his $1.5 million promotion bill rivaling a whole coffee industry’s.

The boldness that done him abounding also valid his downfall. After Collier’s Weekly — a periodical that was muckraking fake promotion during a time — lambasted Postum, he slandered it and got sued, with a coffee peddlers energetically examination as a prosecutor assured a jury to “make this male honest again,” according to The New York Times. Coffee trade magazines called out a father of a Food and Drug Administration, Harvey Wiley, for ignoring Post in his food-industry investigations. Wiley was no crony of a coffee industry; he believed, as Pendergrast records in his book Uncommon Grounds, that “coffee immoderation is a commoner unwell than a whiskey habit.” But Post’s ads were an annoying pain, and he finally forced Post to stop promotion Postum as coffee.

Postum announcement 1910

Source Public Domain/Wikipedia

While a coffee attention successfully capitalized on open direct for transparency, holding down substitutes’ snake-oil-style advertising, it also managed to fire itself in a foot. Not everybody drank coffee, though entrance to a inexpensive cuppa by afterwards had turn an American birthright. So in 1906, when Arbuckle’s aged aspirant Sielcken bankrolled a Brazilian government’s intrigue to seclude over-abundance beans, Americans were outraged. Substitutes charity a “healthier,” cheaper choice gained steam. Under a successive fusillade of pseudo-scientific conflict ads, coffee brands motionless a wisest movement was swiping during any other’s throats. If one ad claimed that coffee’s tannins or acids caused a health problem, any other code countered with pseudo-medical longhorn claiming that that was what happened when we drank any other brand.

Unsurprisingly, this undermined people’s faith in a health advantages of coffee. So, after Postum was dispatched, heads of a attention and editors of tip trade publications shaped a National Coffee Roasters Association. In 1912, to urge a industry’s brewing standards, they charged inventor/researcher/entrepreneur and destiny authority Edward Aborn with conducting a initial investigate of coffee’s chemical composition. They quiescent a dainty ad campaigns in preference of some-more systematic ones — contracting moment teams of Mad group who used psychological investigate to figure out how best to aim customers, says Pendergrast.

Brands that resisted a new systematic character of advertising, including a once-dominant Arbuckle, fast crumbled. And on a eve of a Jazz Age, a NCRA approached Prescott for help, lifting their potion on a new coffee era.