Keurig coffee builder started a $100k fire, insurer Liberty Mutual alleges




Who doesn’t wish to arise adult to a bubbling crater of coffee?

But walking in to find your coffee builder in flames, that’s another story.

Advertisement

Yet Katherine White encountered that dual years ago when her recently purchased Keurig appurtenance mysteriously held glow and caused $100,000 value of fume repairs to her Upton home, forcing her family to initial pierce out and afterwards pierce into a groundwork for months during a renovations.

Now that glow is during a core of a brawl that’s brewing between dual of New England’s many iconic brands.

White’s word company, Boston-based Liberty Mutual, has sued Keurig Green Mountain Inc., a Vermont company, over a coffee appurtenance and ensuing damage.

Liberty Mutual, that paid for a home repairs, pronounced Keurig is to censure and contends a brewing machine, a K70 model, is vulnerable and should not have been on store shelves, according to a lawsuit filed in Suffolk Superior Court.

“The coffee builder was poor and unreasonably dangerous and therefore not fit for dictated use,” Liberty Mutual’s censure states.

Advertisement


Liberty Mutual declined to criticism about a suit.

Keurig pronounced reserve is a priority and that a machines are built with thermal sensors and tested to safeguard they accommodate regulatory standards.

“We are generally unknowingly of a brewers being a means of any fires,” pronounced Katie Gilroy, a Keurig spokeswoman. “In many cases of allegations per a brewers, after it is investigated it is found that there are choice causes to glow incidents, including electrical.”

Keurig stopped producing a K70 indication in 2014. Gilroy declined to criticism about a lawsuit, though pronounced Keurig’s insurer denied a strange 2014 explain from Liberty Mutual.

With a single-serve K-cups, Keurig has turn a domicile name, winning over caffeine addicts as good as once-a-day drinkers. But it has also been a aim of complaints.

In 2014, Keurig was forced to remember 6.6 million MINI Plus brewers after receiving reports that consumers suffered browns on their faces, hands, and bodies when prohibited water, coffee, and drift sprayed out of a brewers. This past March, Keurig, though acknowledging any wrongdoing, paid a Consumer Product Safety Commission $5.8 million to settle charges it unsuccessful to immediately news a forsake to a sovereign government, as compulsory by law.

In 2015, glow officials in Oregon suspected a Keurig appurtenance overheated and sparked a glow that broken an Oregon apartment, according to news reports. Keurig, however, pronounced a third-party forensics consultant found that a brewer’s wiring and other inner components were not shop-worn in that fire, suggesting a glow did not issue with a machine.

A handful of consumers and one internal supervision group have reported Keurigs smoking and throwing glow to SaferProducts.gov, a Consumer Product Safety Commission website.

White pronounced she bought a Keurig a few months before a fire. She left a brewer plugged in, though incited off. While she was doing yard work, her fume detectors went off. “We suspicion it was a portion or a humidity,” White said.

She raced inside and found a Keurig in flames. While a glow was contained, fume trafficked by her home.

White, 65, now late in Florida, pronounced she incited in her K-cups. “I’m now regulating an out-of-date percolator,” she said.

Deirdre Fernandes can be reached during deirdre.fernandes@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @fernandesglobe.